-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Layer leap #1764
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Layer leap #1764
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
||
<PublicPreviewBannerPartial /> | ||
|
||
## Single click bridging from L1 to L3 is now possible with layer leap |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need a few sentences here to explain what layer leap is, why we built it, and how it is implemented.
|
||
| Contract | Address | | ||
| --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | | ||
| Arb One L1Teleporter | https://etherscan.io/address/0xCBd9c6e310D6AaDeF9F025f716284162F0158992 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirming that the addresses for Nova and Arb1 are indeed identical? If they are the same, then maybe we should add a italicized note/sentence that these are the same. Initial reaction from seeing this is that this is a typo
Also any reason why we have 2 rows instead of 1 if the addresses are the same?
|
||
## Launch details | ||
|
||
_Key timelines & announcements_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think these sort of info should be much earlier in the page and more obvious. Perhaps a banner at the very top?
arbitrum-docs/build-decentralized-apps/token-bridging/layer-leap.mdx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ | |||
--- | |||
title: 'Layer leap contracts' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it Layer Leap or layer leap?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Layer Leap
### Arbitrum bridge UI: if you are already on the arbitrum bridge UI then you can sign up for layer leap adoption by using this [github template](https://github.com/offchainlabs/arbitrum-token-bridge/issues/new?assignees=&labels=feat%2ctriage&projects=&template=add-layerleap-request.yml&title=%5bfeat%5d%3a+enable+layer+leap+for+%3corbit+chain%3e). | ||
|
||
- If you are not on the Arbitrum Bridge UI yet you can sign up by filling out this [GitHub Template](https://github.com/OffchainLabs/arbitrum-token-bridge/issues/new?assignees=&labels=feat%2Ctriage&projects=&template=add-orbit-chain-request.yml&title=%5Bfeat%5D%3A+), and then also fill out the template above. | ||
- You can demo Layer Leap on the Arbitrum Bridge by bridging to [Rari](https://bridge.arbitrum.io/?destinationChain=rari-mainnet&sourceChain=ethereum) and [Proof of Play](https://bridge.arbitrum.io/?destinationChain=pop-apex&sourceChain=ethereum). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps a demo of Layer Leap should be one of the 1st things a user sees/reads in this page.
|
||
Sending tokens from L2 to L3 relies on creation of a retryable. If you are supporting Layer Leap for your Orbit chains it’s highly recommended to be running the Retryables Monitoring tool: https://github.com/OffchainLabs/arb-retryables-monitoring. This will allow you to track and redeem any failed retryables | ||
|
||
_What configuration options or parameter changes should I consider?_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels incomplete and I'd argue that, even if it were complete, this info should be available before we give the user a way to adopt it
|
||
For non Arbitrum One L3s: | ||
|
||
- To enable Layer Leap for your Layer 3 you can follow the Deployment Procedure defined [here](https://github.com/OffchainLabs/l1-l3-teleport-contracts/blob/main/docs/info.md). Before self deploying, let Offchain Labs know about your request! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about for L3s on Nova? It's not clear to me without reading a bit more that a new contract deployment is what is required for L3s on Arb1 and Nova.
Also how does someone contact offchain labs here? We should add a contact link/form.
|
||
- To enable Layer Leap for your Layer 3 you can follow the Deployment Procedure defined [here](https://github.com/OffchainLabs/l1-l3-teleport-contracts/blob/main/docs/info.md). Before self deploying, let Offchain Labs know about your request! | ||
|
||
_Implementation requirements for RaaSes?_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This probably be its own section since the entire page so far has been aimed at orbit chain owners
|
||
_Implementation requirements for RaaSes?_ | ||
|
||
Sending tokens from L2 to L3 relies on creation of a retryable. If you are supporting Layer Leap for your Orbit chains it’s highly recommended to be running the Retryables Monitoring tool: https://github.com/OffchainLabs/arb-retryables-monitoring. This will allow you to track and redeem any failed retryables |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would probably prefer to see this hyperlinked. Also when we talk about retryables, we should refer to https://docs.arbitrum.io/how-arbitrum-works/arbos/l1-l2-messaging#retryable-tickets
This reverts commit 749ef46.
…ap.mdx Co-authored-by: Derek Lee <[email protected]>
No description provided.